U.S. policymakers are increasingly scrutinizing the nation’s historically and internationally high incarceration rates. Over the past few decades, policy changes related to criminal sentencing, not an increase in crime, have put more people—especially young black men—behind bars. According to the President’s Council of Economic Advisers, from 1980 to 2014, the U.S. incarceration rate increased dramatically by 220 percent while violent crime rates actually declined by 39 percent.
This increased incarceration fails a cost-benefit analysis and may actually increase criminality. But it also distorts our economic data, which in several ways makes us underestimate the state of—and overestimate the improvement in—some forms of racial inequalities.
If you pay attention to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ monthly Employment Situation report, you’ll notice that all the data that covers a share of the population will specify that it’s the “civilian population.” That means the population that’s the denominator of the employment-to-population ratio or the labor force participation rate is only comprised of “civilian” Americans. In other words, members of the U.S. Armed Services aren’t included.
But incarcerated people don’t get counted either. That means that for groups with higher rates of incarceration, their employment-to-population ratios and labor force participation rates will be higher than if we counted those in prisons and jails as not having a job. And if incarceration is increasing more among certain groups, gains in these rates will be higher than if these people were counted as not having jobs.
(Read the rest here.)